EasyCoexistence vs WATI
These are different products rather than competing versions of one. WATI sells a shared team inbox, priced by users and monthly active contacts. EasyCoexistence sells the connection itself, priced per number, with no inbox at all.
What the monthly bill is actually for
The two products are priced on different units, and for anyone holding more than one number that difference compounds every month.
WATI: Per user and per monthly active contact. Published plans run three to ten users and 500 to 2,500 contacts as of September 2026, so the bill climbs with every agent hired and every customer spoken to.
EasyCoexistence: One flat fee per connected number, with no user limit and no contact limit. An agency's twentieth client costs no more than its first, and a busy month costs the same as a quiet one.
Where your customers' conversations end up
This is the difference that cannot be undone later, and it follows from what each product is.
WATI: On their platform. A shared inbox has to store message content in order to serve it back to whoever opens it, which their pricing page lists as a core feature of every plan.
EasyCoexistence: Nowhere on our side. Meta delivers message events straight to a URL you nominate, and anything reaching our fallback callback is dropped without being persisted. That is enforced in code, not stated in a policy.
Whether your team has to change how it works
The question a business owner asks before agreeing to anything.
WATI: Agents log into their inbox. That is where conversations are assigned, tagged and answered, which means the team moves off the phone and into a new tool.
EasyCoexistence: Nobody moves. The WhatsApp Business app keeps working on the same number through Coexistence, with the same chats and the same history, and software handles whatever you built it to handle.
What happens when you outgrow it
Both have a ceiling. They are in different places.
WATI: More users and more active contacts, each a paid step up. The platform is the product, so scaling means buying more of it.
EasyCoexistence: There is no tier and nothing to outgrow. You are building the interface, so what you scale is your own system, on Meta's documented API with nothing of ours in between.
When an inbox is what you need
One case, and naming it is what makes the rest of this page useful.
WATI: A support team of eight people dividing conversations inside their platform, on a plan that starts at 4,999 rupees a month for three users and 500 monthly active contacts, with each further user charged on top.
EasyCoexistence: A different job. There is no inbox and no agent view here, because the interface is the part you or your client already have.
Which one to choose
If a team of agents is going to log in every day and conversations are the work itself, buy the inbox. WATI built one and it does what it says.
For everyone else, and that is most people reading this, the inbox is the part you pay for and do not use. An agency holding client numbers is buying seats nobody opens. A developer building the interface is putting a competitor between their product and Meta's API. A small business is being asked to move off a phone that already works.
EasyCoexistence is the connection underneath, at a flat fee per number, with the conversations going to your systems and the team keeping the app they already know.
Frequently asked questions
What happens when I pass 500 contacts?
On their entry plan you move up a tier. With us nothing happens: there is no contact limit at any price, so a month with ten thousand customers costs what a month with ten costs.
Is one cheaper?
For up to six numbers, we are, against their entry plan. That plan is 4,999 rupees a month, roughly US$ 53, for three users and 500 monthly active contacts. Ours is US$ 9 per connected number, or US$ 7 each from six numbers, so six numbers come to US$ 42 a month. Beyond that, the answer depends on their charges per extra user and per contact tier, which rise with the team and the customer base, while ours rises only when you connect more numbers.
Does WATI support Coexistence?
Their pricing page does not address it. Ask them rather than relying on this page.
Do you have a mobile app?
No. The team uses the WhatsApp Business app, which is the point of Coexistence.
Keep reading
- EasyCoexistence vs a BSP inboxA BSP gives you a shared inbox and sits in the message path. Coexistence keeps the phone and routes messages to your own systems. When each one is right.
- EasyCoexistence vs 360dialogBoth charge per number and neither marks up Meta's fees. The difference is the price and what the fee is for. Prices as published in September 2026.
- WhatsApp Coexistence: the app and the API on one numberCoexistence runs the WhatsApp Business app and the Cloud API on the same number at once. What it changes, what it does not, and how a number gets connected.
- WhatsApp Coexistence for agencies and consultanciesConnect client WhatsApp numbers without migrating them or retraining their staff. One account, many numbers, each in the client's own Business Portfolio.
- What WhatsApp Coexistence costs, provider by providerWhat each provider charges to hold WhatsApp numbers, at one, ten and fifty numbers. Figures from their own pricing pages, September 2026.
- EasyCoexistence vs respond.ioRespond.io is a multichannel inbox priced per seat and contact. EasyCoexistence charges per connected number, with no seats and nothing per message.
Ready to get started?
Set up WhatsApp Coexistence in minutes, not months. The app keeps working on the phone.
Start Free TrialNothing charged for 3 days. Cancel anytime.Verified on
Product names and trademarks belong to their owners. EasyCoexistence is not affiliated with the companies compared here, and their prices are as published on their own sites on the date above.